Low Price Guarantee
We Take School POs
Please login or create a free account to submit a review

Macroeconomics and the Phillips Curve Myth
Contributor(s): Forder, James (Author)

View larger image

ISBN: 0199683654     ISBN-13: 9780199683659
Publisher: Oxford University Press
OUR PRICE: $142.50  

Binding Type: Hardcover - See All Available Formats & Editions
Published: December 2014
Qty:
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Business & Economics | Economics - Macroeconomics
- Business & Economics | Economic History
- Business & Economics | Economics - Theory
Dewey: 339
LCCN: 2014939136
Physical Information: 0.8" H x 6.2" W x 9.2" L (1.10 lbs) 318 pages
Features: Bibliography, Index
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
This book reconsiders the role of the Phillips curve in macroeconomic analysis in the first twenty years following the famous work by A. W. H. Phillips, after whom it is named. It argues that the story conventionally told is entirely misleading. In that story, Phillips made a great
breakthrough but his work led to a view that inflationary policy could be used systematically to maintain low unemployment, and that it was only after the work of Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps about a decade after Phillips' that this view was rejected. On the contrary, a detailed analysis of the
literature of the times shows that the idea of a negative relation between wage change and unemployment - supposedly Phillips' discovery - was commonplace in the 1950s, as were the arguments attributed to Friedman and Phelps by the conventional story. And, perhaps most importantly, there is scarcely
any sign of the idea of the inflation-unemployment tradeoff promoting inflationary policy, either in the theoretical literature or in actual policymaking. The book demonstrates and identifies a number of main strands of the actual thinking of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s on the question of the
determination of inflation and its relation to other variables.

The result is not only a rejection of the Phillips curve story as it has been told, and a reassessment of the understanding of the economists of those years of macroeconomics, but also the construction of an alternative, and historically more authentic account, of the economic theory of those times.
A notable outcome is that the economic theory of the time was not nearly so naive as it has been portrayed.

 
Customer ReviewsSubmit your own review
 
To tell a friend about this book, you must Sign In First!